Nothing to see here folks, just a bit of de-population...mosey on now.

[math is hard]

By the way, aluminium-resistant crops have been a goal for almost 100 years. Monsanto isn't doing anything new or sinister by researching them.

Source: http://contrailscience.com/what-in-t...they-spraying/

[Spencer]

when it comes to depopulating, its not based on eradicating people all at once. Its about creating sickness, beefing up rx companies profits and getting the elderly out of here asap.

There are many angles to this, that's why I say to research Monsanto, see what they have done and come to your own conclusions. Don't let nuts like me and smug unemployed kooks like mih sway your decision. Obviously something is up and its obviously detrimental to us. That is true mo matter how you look at it

I have no problem with anyone taking issue with Monsanto and their business practices. Like any HUGE multinational company, there's corruption, unethical behaviour and a desire to make money at more of a cost than most of the public would be happy about. You're correct, there is tons of info out there on questionable practices that Monsanto is involved in. I have a degree in Biology (whoop de doo), and we certainly studied issues central to Monsanto's business practices.

HOWEVER, that doesn't mean that we should all jump on the bandwagon in regards to chemtrails. There's a plain lack of any substantiated science base to these claims, pure and simple. As with so many of the issues dear to the hearts of those labeled 'conspiracy theorists', the evidence so often claimed is, in fact, a collection of non-scientific websites and arguments involving circular logic.

[xxxVALETUDOxxx]

By the way, aluminium-resistant crops have been a goal for almost 100 years. Monsanto isn't doing anything new or sinister by researching them.

Source: http://contrailscience.com/what-in-t...they-spraying/

researching...no. But patenting and then sueing and pitting out of biz surrounding farmers who didn't want their strains anyways? Yeah that's pretty damn sinister


when they tried to pull this in mex, the cartel was called in to intimidate

Peru said **** you and banned them.

Unfortunately guard let them in and they are already putting my inlaws out of business

[math is hard]

researching...no. But patenting and then sueing and pitting out of biz surrounding farmers who didn't want their strains anyways? Yeah that's pretty damn sinister


when they tried to pull this in mex, the cartel was called in to intimidate

Peru said **** you and banned them.

Unfortunately guard let them in and they are already putting my inlaws out of business

And this proves an overarching conspiracy to increase aluminium levels in soil by the least efficient means possible? Yeah, seems legit.

I've said before, I don't like Monsanto. I think they're shady as ****. But that doesn't prove anything about the existence of contrails. There's no such thing as guilt by association when you're trying to prove something this crazy.

[xxxVALETUDOxxx]

I have no problem with anyone taking issue with Monsanto and their business practices. Like any HUGE multinational company, there's corruption, unethical behaviour and a desire to make money at more of a cost than most of the public would be happy about. You're correct, there is tons of info out there on questionable practices that Monsanto is involved in. I have a degree in Biology (whoop de doo), and we certainly studied issues central to Monsanto's business practices.

HOWEVER, that doesn't mean that we should all jump on the bandwagon in regards to chemtrails. There's a plain lack of any substantiated science base to these claims, pure and simple. As with so many of the issues dear to the hearts of those labeled 'conspiracy theorists', the evidence so often claimed is, in fact, a collection of non-scientific websites and arguments involving circular logic.

Im not saying to jump on bandwagon, im just saying to be aware. To question what is "fact" because it's not always the actual truth

[xxxVALETUDOxxx]

By the way, aluminium-resistant crops have been a goal for almost 100 years. Monsanto isn't doing anything new or sinister by researching them.

Source: http://contrailscience.com/what-in-t...they-spraying/

researching...no. But patenting and then sueing and pitting out of biz surrounding farmers who didn't want their strains anyways? Yeah that's pretty damn sinister


when they tried to pull this in mex, the cartel was called in to intimidate

Peru said **** you and banned them.

Unfortunately guard let them in and they are already putting my inlaws out of business

[Baphomet3]

Hey, I remember this thread . . .

[Vlad]

Hey, I remember this thread . . .

You better remember this thread, you saucy little slut.

I didn't pm you pictures of me doing karate in barbed wire thong for nothing, you know.

[xxxVALETUDOxxx]

You better remember this thread, you saucy little slut.

I didn't pm you pictures of me doing karate in barbed wire thong for nothing, you know.

Would it really be that difficult to put a coma and then another username on those PM's?

[xxxVALETUDOxxx]

[QUOTE=math is hard;2007885]And this proves an overarching conspiracy to increase aluminium levels in soil by the least efficient means possible? Yeah, seems legit.[QUOTE]

Explain please. Least efficient? I'm not being stubborn or sarcastic, please explain that to me. As in, what would be more efficient to do something like that?

I've said before, I don't like Monsanto. I think they're shady as ****. But that doesn't prove anything about the existence of contrails. There's no such thing as guilt by association when you're trying to prove something this crazy.

Yeah, contrails exist. They come out of the back of planes all the time.

No but for real I understand what you are trying to get across. I just have my doubts is all.