+ Reply to Thread
Page 27 of 27 FirstFirst ... 17 25 26 27
Results 261 to 264 of 264

Thread: Alex Jones on Piers Morgan's show...enjoy.

  1. #261
    MMAWeekly Regular Lord Garth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    11,358

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by math is hard View Post
    Good, so you agree with me.



    That's a bad analogy, and you know it.
    Yours was equally bad. It takes serious credulity to believe that Obama is as competent to handle anything as romney

  2. #262
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Ottawa, ON
    Posts
    3,417

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Lord Garth View Post
    Yours was equally bad. It takes serious credulity to believe that Obama is as competent to handle anything as romney
    I didn't make any analogy. I asked a question.

  3. #263
    MMAWeekly Regular Lord Garth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    11,358

    Default

    what a topsy turvy, mad world we live in. Pravda speaks the truth, and there is an article in Pravda that dumbocrats and Canadians will not like

    Quote Originally Posted by http://english.pravda.ru/opinion/columnists/28-12-2012/123335-americans_guns-0/
    hese days, there are few things to admire about the socialist, bankrupt and culturally degenerating USA, but at least so far, one thing remains: the right to bear arms and use deadly force to defend one's self and possessions.

    This will probably come as a total shock to most of my Western readers, but at one point, Russia was one of the most heavily armed societies on earth. This was, of course, when we were free under the Tsar. Weapons, from swords and spears to pistols, rifles and shotguns were everywhere, common items. People carried them concealed, they carried them holstered. Fighting knives were a prominent part of many traditional attires and those little tubes criss crossing on the costumes of Cossacks and various Caucasian peoples? Well those are bullet holders for rifles.

    Also read: How American matrix destroys every culture


    Various armies, such as the Poles, during the Смута (Times of Troubles), or Napoleon, or the Germans even as the Tsarist state collapsed under the weight of WW1 and Wall Street monies, found that holding Russian lands was much much harder than taking them and taking was no easy walk in the park but a blood bath all its own. In holding, one faced an extremely well armed and aggressive population Hell bent on exterminating or driving out the aggressor.

    This well armed population was what allowed the various White factions to rise up, no matter how disorganized politically and militarily they were in 1918 and wage a savage civil war against the Reds. It should be noted that many of these armies were armed peasants, villagers, farmers and merchants, protecting their own. If it had not been for Washington's clandestine support of and for the Reds, history would have gone quite differently.

    Moscow fell, for example, not from a lack of weapons to defend it, but from the lying guile of the Reds. Ten thousand Reds took Moscow and were opposed only by some few hundreds of officer cadets and their instructors. Even then the battle was fierce and losses high. However, in the city alone, at that time, lived over 30,000 military officers (both active and retired), all with their own issued weapons and ammunition, plus tens of thousands of other citizens who were armed. The Soviets promised to leave them all alone if they did not intervene. They did not and for that were asked afterwards to come register themselves and their weapons: where they were promptly shot.

    Of course being savages, murderers and liars does not mean being stupid and the Reds learned from their Civil War experience. One of the first things they did was to disarm the population. From that point, mass repression, mass arrests, mass deportations, mass murder, mass starvation were all a safe game for the powers that were. The worst they had to fear was a pitchfork in the guts or a knife in the back or the occasional hunting rifle. Not much for soldiers.

    To this day, with the Soviet Union now dead 21 years, with a whole generation born and raised to adulthood without the SU, we are still denied our basic and traditional rights to self defense. Why? We are told that everyone would just start shooting each other and crime would be everywhere....but criminals are still armed and still murdering and too often, especially in the far regions, those criminals wear the uniforms of the police. The fact that everyone would start shooting is also laughable when statistics are examined.

    While President Putin pushes through reforms, the local authorities, especially in our vast hinterland, do not feel they need to act like they work for the people. They do as they please, a tyrannical class who knows they have absolutely nothing to fear from a relatively unarmed population. This in turn breeds not respect but absolute contempt and often enough, criminal abuse.

    For those of us fighting for our traditional rights, the US 2nd Amendment is a rare light in an ever darkening room. Governments will use the excuse of trying to protect the people from maniacs and crime, but are in reality, it is the bureaucrats protecting their power and position. In all cases where guns are banned, gun crime continues and often increases. As for maniacs, be it nuts with cars (NYC, Chapel Hill NC), swords (Japan), knives (China) or home made bombs (everywhere), insane people strike. They throw acid (Pakistan, UK), they throw fire bombs (France), they attack. What is worse, is, that the best way to stop a maniac is not psychology or jail or "talking to them", it is a bullet in the head, that is why they are a maniac, because they are incapable of living in reality or stopping themselves.

    The excuse that people will start shooting each other is also plain and silly. So it is our politicians saying that our society is full of incapable adolescents who can never be trusted? Then, please explain how we can trust them or the police, who themselves grew up and came from the same culture?

    No it is about power and a total power over the people. There is a lot of desire to bad mouth the Tsar, particularly by the Communists, who claim he was a tyrant, and yet under him we were armed and under the progressives disarmed. Do not be fooled by a belief that progressives, leftists hate guns. Oh, no, they do not. What they hate is guns in the hands of those who are not marching in lock step of their ideology. They hate guns in the hands of those who think for themselves and do not obey without question. They hate guns in those whom they have slated for a barrel to the back of the ear.

    So, do not fall for the false promises and do not extinguish the light that is left to allow humanity a measure of self respect.

    Stanislav Mishin

  4. #264
    Senior Member Floyd1982's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Posts
    5,504

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by sonzai View Post
    And my point is that Obama is the boogy man for quite a large portion of this forum. Did Obama do any more (or less) than Bush the Lesser or Clinton or any of the other various congress critters warming their seats for the past 20-30 years? It's all a sh1t show, but for whatever reason (convenience 'cause he's in now, ideological differences, personal dislike) Obama is the alpha and omega of evil for much of this forum. Also, I've been around political/economic discussions long enough that a lot of the apocalyptic scenarios and conspiracies I see trotted out as iron-clad "truf" on this forum are old-hat and dull. I've been hearing the same sh1t since the late 80s. Ho hum.

    If you've been around here long enough you'd know that I hate Obama as much as Bush (to use the easiest examples). However, much like Baph, due to certain philosophical beliefs of my own, I tend to look like I choose one side over another.

    For the record, I mostly like Iceland's approach to 2008 and its aftermath (from what I can understand of it) and wished that other nations had done the same, or that they at least had taken steps to avert a full-scale collapse in the first place.
    When you say you have been hearing this "ho hum" since the 80's, are you implying the US economy is fine and there is no real threat of economic collapse in our future if deficit spending and entitlement raise to record levels? I'm just asking, not leading you or setting you up for anything.

    Also, I admit I only read one article about Iceland's approach but it doesn't seem feasible in a country that is 10 times the size could have similar results. From the article, Iceland decided to say "f*ck it" we aren't paying our debts to foreign countries and seized control of the banks. If you are going to spend money, I do like how it benefitted the consumer and not the bank, Ron Paul actually said the same thing, he said he didn't support government spending but if it was going to be spent, at least give it to the consumer and not bi banks. I also like how they cut spending across the board and I would support higher taxes on the wealthy IF spending would be dramatically curbed but I think overall the tax system needs to be abandoned and a new one created.

    I just cant get behind government seizing banks b/c of something they helped create (in the US at least) and just sweeping debts owed under the rug. Could you imagine what would happen if the US said, "meh, I don't think we should have to pay you?"

    http://mobile.bloomberg.com/news/201...-correct-.html
    Last edited by Floyd1982; 01-21-2013 at 12:50 PM.
    .............

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts